Re: Linux 2.6.30-rc8 [also: VIA Support]

From: Harald Welte
Date: Fri Jun 05 2009 - 03:39:37 EST


On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:16:35PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > why would it matter on UP? as indicated, I'm not the expert here, but I thought
> > memory ordering issues only arise in SMP systems [or possibly with regard to
> > DMA, but as we already explored much earlier in this thread, drivers that access
> > DMA buffers whil the hardware owns them are buggy and need to be fixed]
>
> Sorry we didn't establish that. Accessing data structures that are
> also accessed by DMA hardware is pretty common in fact and memory
> ordering issues also come up regularly (e.g. all the infamous PCI
> posting bugs)
>
> What we established is that the drivers don't use LOCK for it
> (or at least we think that's very unlikely)

Yes, sorry for not mentioning that. I was implicitly thinking of "not using an
appropriate locking method"

--
- Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@xxxxxxxxxxx> http://linux.via.com.tw/
============================================================================
VIA Free and Open Source Software Liaison
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/