Re: [PATCH] [2/2] KVM: Add VT-x machine check support

[Avi Kivity]

Andi Kleen wrote:
> > There's no good place as it breaks the nice exit handler table.  You 
> > could put it in vmx_complete_interrupts() next to NMI handling.
> >     
>
> I think I came up with a easy cheesy but not too bad solution now that should 
> work. It simply remembers the CPU in the vcpu structure and schedules back to 
> it. That's fine for this purpose. 
>   

We might be able schedule back in a timely manner.  Why not hack 
vmx_complete_interrupts()?  You're still in the critical section so 
you're guaranteed no delays or surprises.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/