Re: [PATCH] fuse: cache invalidation calls

From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Thu Jun 04 2009 - 05:35:52 EST


On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Csaba Henk wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Anand Avati wrote:
> >> I was wondering how the userland libfuse would be made aware of the
> >> presence of these two notification features?
> >
> > Here's a patch against fuse CVS. ÂIt's also from John Muir.
>
> In fact, what we were meditating about is the lack of the
> FUSE_KERNEL_MINOR_VERSION bump. Without that, how do the two parties
> negotiate if the rev inval messages are understood? One of John's
> patches in his patchset had it bumped though...

Yes, I removed that intentionally as hopefully this will go in 2.6.31
with the other 10 -> 11 API changes.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/