Re: [PATCH 00/19] periodic write-back timer optimization

From: Artem Bityutskiy
Date: Wed Jun 03 2009 - 07:14:32 EST


Jens Axboe wrote:
On Thu, May 28 2009, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
That would be great, I would have no problem integrating such a feature.
It definitely makes sense.
Hi Al, Christoph,

unless you have objections against the whole idea, I wonder if
it would be possible to make the patches which wrap sb->s_dirt
usage go via VFS tree first, and then I'd continue the timer
optimization work separately. IMO, wrapping s_dirt makes sense
in general. I mean, patches 01-17 from this series.

That makese sense, those are totally separate from the actual
functionality.

Reminding ping.

--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (ÐÑÑÑÐ ÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐ)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/