Re: trace: fix multiple use of __print_flags and __print_symbolic

[Li Zefan]

Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> When using multiple calls to __print_symbolic and __print_flags in
> the same tracer, I noticed that the output was incorrect. I think
> the following patch is the correct fix (it works for me) but please
> check it carefully since I'm not that familiar with this code,
> and I may well have made a mistake somewhere.
> 

I don't see there's bug in __print_symbolic() or __print_flags():

enum print_line_t
ftrace_raw_output_##call(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags)
{
	...
	p = &get_cpu_var(ftrace_event_seq);
	/* here we call ftrace_print_flags_seq(p, ...) */
	ret = trace_seq_printf(s, #call ": " print);
	put_cpu();
	...
}

ftrace_event_seq is percpu data, and here is used with preempt-disabled,
so there shouldn't be problem of concurrent accessing.


> The patch is vs. the latest -tip tree which doesn't yet seem to
> contain the EXPORT_SYMBOL() fix that I sent earlier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> index c12d95d..ac6ced1 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> @@ -222,10 +222,9 @@ ftrace_print_flags_seq(struct trace_seq *p, const char *delim,
>  {
>  	unsigned long mask;
>  	const char *str;
> +	const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	trace_seq_init(p);
> -

This is wrong. Without reseting, the seq buffer will quickly be filled.

>  	for (i = 0;  flag_array[i].name && flags; i++) {
>  
>  		mask = flag_array[i].mask;
> @@ -248,7 +247,7 @@ ftrace_print_flags_seq(struct trace_seq *p, const char *delim,
>  
>  	trace_seq_putc(p, 0);
>  
> -	return p->buffer;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  const char *
> @@ -256,8 +255,7 @@ ftrace_print_symbols_seq(struct trace_seq *p, unsigned long val,
>  			 const struct trace_print_flags *symbol_array)
>  {
>  	int i;
> -
> -	trace_seq_init(p);
> +	const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len;
>  
>  	for (i = 0;  symbol_array[i].name; i++) {
>  
> @@ -273,7 +271,7 @@ ftrace_print_symbols_seq(struct trace_seq *p, unsigned long val,
>  		
>  	trace_seq_putc(p, 0);
>  
> -	return p->buffer;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/