Re: [PATCH 4/4] ide: add struct ide_port_ops

From: Sergei Shtylyov
Date: Tue Jun 02 2009 - 15:41:29 EST


Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

* Move hooks for port/host specific methods from ide_hwif_t to
'struct ide_port_ops'.

* Add 'const struct ide_port_ops *port_ops' to 'struct ide_port_info'
and ide_hwif_t.

* Update host drivers and core code accordingly.

While at it:

* Rename ata66_*() cable detect functions to *_cable_detect() to match
the standard naming. (Suggested by Sergei Shtylyov)

Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>

Noticed an issue in pdc202xx_old.c:

Index: b/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void pdc202xx_set_pio_mode(ide_dr
pdc202xx_set_mode(drive, XFER_PIO_0 + pio);
}
-static u8 __devinit pdc2026x_old_cable_detect(ide_hwif_t *hwif)
+static u8 __devinit pdc2026x_cable_detect(ide_hwif_t *hwif)
{
struct pci_dev *dev = to_pci_dev(hwif->dev);
u16 CIS, mask = hwif->channel ? (1 << 11) : (1 << 10);
@@ -226,26 +226,6 @@ somebody_else:
return (dma_stat & 4) == 4; /* return 1 if INTR asserted */
}
-static void pdc202xx_dma_lost_irq(ide_drive_t *drive)
-{
- ide_hwif_t *hwif = HWIF(drive);
-
- if (hwif->resetproc != NULL)
- hwif->resetproc(drive);
-
- ide_dma_lost_irq(drive);
-}
-
-static void pdc202xx_dma_timeout(ide_drive_t *drive)
-{
- ide_hwif_t *hwif = HWIF(drive);
-
- if (hwif->resetproc != NULL)
- hwif->resetproc(drive);
-
- ide_dma_timeout(drive);
-}
-
static void pdc202xx_reset_host (ide_hwif_t *hwif)
{
unsigned long high_16 = hwif->extra_base - 16;
@@ -271,6 +251,18 @@ static void pdc202xx_reset (ide_drive_t ide_set_max_pio(drive);
}
+static void pdc202xx_dma_lost_irq(ide_drive_t *drive)
+{
+ pdc202xx_reset(drive);
+ ide_dma_lost_irq(drive);
+}
+
+static void pdc202xx_dma_timeout(ide_drive_t *drive)
+{
+ pdc202xx_reset(drive);
+ ide_dma_timeout(drive);
+}
+

Oops, missed this illegetimate change while reviewing: PDC20246 doesn't have the resetproc() method, hence this switch to direct calling of pdc202xx_reset() directly was wrong...

static unsigned int __devinit init_chipset_pdc202xx(struct pci_dev *dev,
const char *name)
{
@@ -281,17 +273,6 @@ static void __devinit init_hwif_pdc202xx
{
struct pci_dev *dev = to_pci_dev(hwif->dev);
- hwif->set_pio_mode = &pdc202xx_set_pio_mode;
- hwif->set_dma_mode = &pdc202xx_set_mode;
-
- hwif->quirkproc = &pdc202xx_quirkproc;
-
- if (dev->device != PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROMISE_20246) {
- hwif->resetproc = &pdc202xx_reset;
-
- hwif->cable_detect = pdc2026x_old_cable_detect;
- }
-
if (hwif->dma_base == 0)
return;
@@ -357,6 +338,20 @@ static void __devinit pdc202ata4_fixup_i
IDE_HFLAG_ABUSE_SET_DMA_MODE | \
IDE_HFLAG_OFF_BOARD)
+static const struct ide_port_ops pdc20246_port_ops = {
+ .set_pio_mode = pdc202xx_set_pio_mode,
+ .set_dma_mode = pdc202xx_set_mode,
+ .quirkproc = pdc202xx_quirkproc,
+};
+
+static const struct ide_port_ops pdc2026x_port_ops = {
+ .set_pio_mode = pdc202xx_set_pio_mode,
+ .set_dma_mode = pdc202xx_set_mode,
+ .quirkproc = pdc202xx_quirkproc,
+ .resetproc = pdc202xx_reset,
+ .cable_detect = pdc2026x_cable_detect,
+};
+
#define DECLARE_PDC2026X_DEV(name_str, udma, extra_flags) \
{ \
.name = name_str, \
@@ -364,6 +359,7 @@ static void __devinit pdc202ata4_fixup_i
.init_hwif = init_hwif_pdc202xx, \
.init_dma = init_dma_pdc202xx, \
.extra = 48, \
+ .port_ops = &pdc2026x_port_ops, \
.host_flags = IDE_HFLAGS_PDC202XX | extra_flags, \
.pio_mask = ATA_PIO4, \
.mwdma_mask = ATA_MWDMA2, \
@@ -376,6 +372,7 @@ static const struct ide_port_info pdc202
.init_chipset = init_chipset_pdc202xx,
.init_hwif = init_hwif_pdc202xx,
.init_dma = init_dma_pdc202xx,
+ .port_ops = &pdc20246_port_ops,
.extra = 16,
.host_flags = IDE_HFLAGS_PDC202XX,
.pio_mask = ATA_PIO4,

MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/