Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH]:RESEND : Return proper error value onfailure of dentry_open]

[vibi sreenivasan]

hi,
	Thanks for replying.
> > [But the fix in -next still misses 'return 0' -> 'return rc' which I
> > though you had tried to change.]
> 
> At this point, we're just collecting measurements, not appraising 
> them. The return code will be the result of appraise_measurement(). 
> For now, the dentry_open shouldn't fail, but if it does, we probably
> should audit it.
> 
Can you please change that comment.
Thanks & Regards
vibi sreenivasan
> Mimi Zohar
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/