[PATCH 3/4] dnotify: do not bother to lock entry->lock when readingmask

From: Eric Paris
Date: Mon Jun 01 2009 - 16:03:50 EST


entry->lock is needed to make sure entry->mask does not change while
manipulating it. In dnotify_should_send_event() we don't care if we get an
old or a new mask value out of this entry so there is no point it taking
the lock.

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c b/fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c
index 5134e89..ec459b6 100644
--- a/fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c
@@ -153,9 +153,8 @@ static bool dnotify_should_send_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
if (!entry)
return false;

- spin_lock(&entry->lock);
send = (mask & entry->mask);
- spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
+
fsnotify_put_mark(entry); /* matches fsnotify_find_mark_entry */

return send;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/