Re: [PATCH 0/4] partitions/ide: improve Host Protected Areahandling

[Alan Cox]

On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:59:29 -0400
Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Alan, given your emphatic ack, is libata likely to follow the same
> model.  Any chance we could have a single boot param that handled both

If the patches get in then it makes no sense not to implement them
identically in libata.

> drivers?  I mean instead of having 2 module params.

No because the modules have different names so it will always be
ide_core.something and libata.something

Bartlomiej - thinking about this I question "nohpa=" because we get into
unneccessary negatives ide_core.hpa= is one less inversion to figure out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/