Re: dd if=/dev/random of=data.bin bs=512 count=1

[Bill Davidsen]

Jon wrote:
> Hello KOSAKI,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > Issuing this command, I expected to get a file 4096 bytes in size.
> > > Could someone let me know if I have missed something..? Or is there a
> > > problem with using /dev/random this way?
> > >
> > > if I have a count=10 it hangs forever (several hours).
> > >
> > > Changing to use /dev/urandom and it generates the file ok.
> >
> > you already have the answer. /dev/random might blocked, /dev/urandom 
> > doesn't.
>
> Is this a "feature" of /dev/random ? ..it does not seem very useful to 
> have it able to block for so long.
Of course. /dev/random generates better random numbers (in the sense of less 
predictable), while /dev/urandom gives you some pseudo-random bits, which mat or 
may not be appropriate for your task. For timing disk speed /dev/zero is faster 
and less overhead.

> Please include my email address in replies,  as I'm not a member of this 
> list.
>
> Best regards, Jon


--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/