Re: [PATCH 4/4] zone_reclaim_mode is always 0 by default

[Christoph Lameter]

On Thu, 21 May 2009, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

> I can't catch up your message. Can you post your patch?
> Can you explain your sanity check?
>
> Now, I decide to remove "nr_online_nodes >= 4" condition.
> Apache regression is really non-sense.

Not sure what that means? Apache regresses with zone reclaim? My
measurements when we introduced zone reclaim showed just the opposite
because Apache would get node local memory and thus run faster. You can
screw this up of course if you load the system so high that the apache
processes are tossed around by the scheduler. Then the node local
allocation may be worse than round robin because all the pages allocated
by a process are now on one node if the scheduler moves the
process to a remote node then all accesses are penalized.

> > Even with 128 nodes and 256 cpus, I _NEVER_ see the
> > system swapping out before allocating off node so I can certainly not
> > reproduce the situation you are seeing.
>
> hmhm. but I don't think we can assume hpc workload.

System swapping due to zone reclaim? zone reclaim only reclaims unmapped
pages so it will not swap. Maybe some bug crept in in the recent changes?
Or you overrode the defaults for zone reclaim?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/