Re: [PATCH] tracing: add trace_event_read_lock()

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Mon May 18 2009 - 20:35:22 EST


On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:59:31PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 07:35:34PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >
> > I found that there is nothing to protect event_hash in
> > ftrace_find_event().
>
> Actually, rcu protects it, but not enough. We have neither
> synchronize_rcu() nor rcu_read_lock.
>
> So we protect against concurrent hlist accesses.
> But the event can be removed when a module is unloaded,
> and that can happen between the time we get the event output
> callback and the time we actually use it.

I will ask the stupid question... Would invoking rcu_barrier() in the
module-exit function take care of this? The rcu_barrier() primitive
waits for all in-flight RCU callbacks to complete execution.

Thanx, Paul

> > RCU can also protect ftrace_find_event(), but it will add
> > latency to kernel. So this fix converts 'trace_event_mutex'
> > to a read/write semaphore, and adds trace_event_read_lock()
> > to protect ftrace_find_event().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > index 665a915..4ef8052 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > @@ -1569,12 +1569,14 @@ static void *s_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> > p = s_next(m, p, &l);
> > }
> >
> > + trace_event_read_lock();
> > return p;
> > }
> >
> > static void s_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> > {
> > atomic_dec(&trace_record_cmdline_disabled);
> > + trace_event_read_unlock();
> > }
> >
> > static void print_lat_help_header(struct seq_file *m)
> > @@ -1817,6 +1819,7 @@ static int trace_empty(struct trace_iterator *iter)
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> > +/* Called with trace_event_read_lock() held. */
> > static enum print_line_t print_trace_line(struct trace_iterator *iter)
> > {
> > enum print_line_t ret;
> > @@ -3008,6 +3011,7 @@ waitagain:
> > offsetof(struct trace_iterator, seq));
> > iter->pos = -1;
> >
> > + trace_event_read_lock();
> > while (find_next_entry_inc(iter) != NULL) {
> > enum print_line_t ret;
> > int len = iter->seq.len;
> > @@ -3024,6 +3028,7 @@ waitagain:
> > if (iter->seq.len >= cnt)
> > break;
> > }
> > + trace_event_read_unlock();
> > /* Now copy what we have to the user */
> > sret = trace_seq_to_user(&iter->seq, ubuf, cnt);
> > @@ -3146,6 +3151,8 @@ static ssize_t tracing_splice_read_pipe(struct file *filp,
> > goto out_err;
> > }
> >
> > + trace_event_read_lock();
> > +
> > /* Fill as many pages as possible. */
> > for (i = 0, rem = len; i < PIPE_BUFFERS && rem; i++) {
> > pages[i] = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> > @@ -3168,6 +3175,7 @@ static ssize_t tracing_splice_read_pipe(struct file *filp,
> > trace_seq_init(&iter->seq);
> > }
> >
> > + trace_event_read_unlock();
> > mutex_unlock(&iter->mutex);
> >
> > spd.nr_pages = i;
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> > index 489c0e8..7136420 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> > /* must be a power of 2 */
> > #define EVENT_HASHSIZE 128
> >
> > -static DEFINE_MUTEX(trace_event_mutex);
> > +static DECLARE_RWSEM(trace_event_mutex);
> > static struct hlist_head event_hash[EVENT_HASHSIZE] __read_mostly;
> >
> > static int next_event_type = __TRACE_LAST_TYPE + 1;
> > @@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ static int task_state_char(unsigned long state)
> > * @type: the type of event to look for
> > *
> > * Returns an event of type @type otherwise NULL
> > + * Called with trace_event_read_lock() held.
> > */
> > struct trace_event *ftrace_find_event(int type)
> > {
> > @@ -475,7 +476,7 @@ struct trace_event *ftrace_find_event(int type)
> >
> > key = type & (EVENT_HASHSIZE - 1);
> >
> > - hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(event, n, &event_hash[key], node) {
> > + hlist_for_each_entry(event, n, &event_hash[key], node) {
> > if (event->type == type)
> > return event;
> > }
> > @@ -513,6 +514,16 @@ static int trace_search_list(struct list_head **list)
> > return last + 1;
> > }
> >
> > +void trace_event_read_lock(void)
> > +{
> > + down_read(&trace_event_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void trace_event_read_unlock(void)
> > +{
> > + up_read(&trace_event_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * register_ftrace_event - register output for an event type
> > * @event: the event type to register
> > @@ -533,7 +544,7 @@ int register_ftrace_event(struct trace_event *event)
> > unsigned key;
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&trace_event_mutex);
> > + down_write(&trace_event_mutex);
> >
> > if (WARN_ON(!event))
> > goto out;
> > @@ -581,11 +592,11 @@ int register_ftrace_event(struct trace_event *event)
> >
> > key = event->type & (EVENT_HASHSIZE - 1);
> >
> > - hlist_add_head_rcu(&event->node, &event_hash[key]);
> > + hlist_add_head(&event->node, &event_hash[key]);
> >
> > ret = event->type;
> > out:
> > - mutex_unlock(&trace_event_mutex);
> > + up_write(&trace_event_mutex);
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
> > @@ -597,10 +608,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_ftrace_event);
> > */
> > int unregister_ftrace_event(struct trace_event *event)
> > {
> > - mutex_lock(&trace_event_mutex);
> > + down_write(&trace_event_mutex);
> > hlist_del(&event->node);
> > list_del(&event->list);
> > - mutex_unlock(&trace_event_mutex);
> > + up_write(&trace_event_mutex);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.h b/kernel/trace/trace_output.h
> > index 6e220a8..ac240e7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.h
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.h
> > @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ extern int seq_print_user_ip(struct trace_seq *s, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > extern int trace_print_context(struct trace_iterator *iter);
> > extern int trace_print_lat_context(struct trace_iterator *iter);
> >
> > +extern void trace_event_read_lock(void);
> > +extern void trace_event_read_unlock(void);
> > extern struct trace_event *ftrace_find_event(int type);
> >
> > extern enum print_line_t trace_nop_print(struct trace_iterator *iter,
>
>
>
> It could be more fine grained. We could have a per event rwsem, and also place the
> protected read section only in trace_print_entry() which is the only racy window.
>
> But I'm not sure it's that worthy since event removal is a rare thing.
>
> So I guess this patch is fine.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/