Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

[trekker.dk]

______________________________________________________________
> Od: pavel@xxxxxx
> Komu: trekker.dk@xxxxxxxxxx
> CC: tuxonice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Datum: 11.05.2009 23:24
> PÅedmÄt: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
>
>Hi!
>
>> >> >To summarise disadvantages:
>> >> >
>> >> >- only core has 8000 LoC
>> >> >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace
>> >> >     (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace).
>> >> >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality.
>> >> >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> >> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works.
>> >> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.)
>> >> 
>> >
>> >Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram?
>> 
>> Regarding hardware - 
>> 
>> 1. AMD Athlon 1700+, VIA KT333 chipset based MB, nVidia GeForce 2
>> 2. AMD X2 Athlon, AMD690V chipset based MB, nVidia 7600GT
>> 3. (current) AMD X4 Phenom II,  AMD780G chipset and nVidia 9600GT 
>> (binary driver for video card every time)
>
>Ok, binary drivers may be a problem. Will it work without that? Should
>be easy to test with init=/bin/bash.
>									Pavel

Yes, that works - and after complete boot w/o loading binary driver resume works too.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/