Re: [PATCH] crypto: tcrypt: add option to not exit on success

From: Jarod Wilson
Date: Wed May 13 2009 - 09:13:54 EST


On Wednesday 13 May 2009 07:38:19 Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 07:08:26AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > Not really sure I agree with the logic here. I agree that its pretty clear that
> > its major value is for quickly testing all the algorithms in a system, but
> > universally failing the loading of the module simply to save a few milliseconds
> > seems like a poor choice. In so doing you create an alias effect, as jarod
> > noted between a non-existent module and a module that failed to load. The
> > aliasing can be resolved, if you want to parse dmesg, but if speed is the issue
> > at hand, that parsing is a significant impact. If you allow the module to load
> > properly, then for the cost of an rmmod, you can tell simply from the exit code
> > of modprobe:
> > 1) If the module was found
> > 2) If the tests passed
>
> As I said, tcrypt should no longer be used to test algorithms.
> Algorithms are tested as they load, with the result available
> in /proc/crypto. tcrypt is just a relic that will be going away.
>
> Do not rely on it.

Hm... FIPS has the requirement that we test all algs before we use any
algs, self-tests on demand before first use for each alg is
insufficient. At first blush, I'm not seeing how we ensure this
happens. How can we trigger a cbc(des3_ede) self-test from userspace?
I see that modprobe'ing des.ko runs the base des and des3_ede
self-tests, but modprobe'ing cbc.ko doesn't lead to any self-tests
being run.

--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@xxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/