Re: [PATCH -mm] vmscan: make mapped executable pages the firstclass citizen

[Alan Cox]

On Sun, 10 May 2009 18:36:19 +0900
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't oppose this policy. PROT_EXEC seems good viewpoint.

I don't think it is that simple

Not only can it be abused but some systems such as java have large
PROT_EXEC mapped environments, as do many other JIT based languages.

Secondly it moves the pressure from the storage volume holding the system
binaries and libraries to the swap device which already has to deal with
a lot of random (and thus expensive) I/O, as well as the users filestore
for mapped objects there - which may even be on a USB thumbdrive.

I still think the focus is on the wrong thing. We shouldn't be trying to
micro-optimise page replacement guesswork - we should be macro-optimising
the resulting I/O performance. My disks each do 50MBytes/second and even with the
Gnome developers finest creations that ought to be enough if the rest of
the system was working properly.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/