Re: [patch 00/88] 2.6.28.10-stable review

[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]

On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> > and the fact that the queue for 2.6.29 isn't even empty yet and there are
> > already more patches waiting to get queued...
> 
> Yes there are, I will work on that next.  But I don't see anything
> "serious" in there that should be in the .28 kernel, do you?

No.

> Traditionally we've dropped the last -stable after the .2 release of the
> new series, why would we change that now?  We only have so much time to
> do this kind of work, and maintaining 3 -stable trees is a major pain,
> trust me...

I can imagine, and I have send you "your work is much appreciated mails"
before ;-)

> However, if you wish to take over 2.6.28 and maintain it after this
> release, I have no objection, just let me know.

No time :(  I wish I could, but I can't do it on paid time, and my hobby
time is already streched way too thin...

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/