[patch 82/88] fix ptrace slowness
From: Greg KH
Date: Thu Apr 30 2009 - 13:45:40 EST
2.6.28-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
commit 53da1d9456fe7f87a920a78fdbdcf1225d197cb7 upstream.
This patch fixes bug #12208:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208
Subject : uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host
This turned out to be not a scheduler regression, but an already
existing problem in ptrace being triggered by subtle scheduler
changes.
The problem is this:
- task A is ptracing task B
- task B stops on a trace event
- task A is woken up and preempts task B
- task A calls ptrace on task B, which does ptrace_check_attach()
- this calls wait_task_inactive(), which sees that task B is still on the runq
- task A goes to sleep for a jiffy
- ...
Since UML does lots of the above sequences, those jiffies quickly add
up to make it slow as hell.
This patch solves this by not rescheduling in read_unlock() after
ptrace_stop() has woken up the tracer.
Thanks to Oleg Nesterov and Ingo Molnar for the feedback.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/signal.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1552,7 +1552,15 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, i
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
if (may_ptrace_stop()) {
do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, CLD_TRAPPED);
+ /*
+ * Don't want to allow preemption here, because
+ * sys_ptrace() needs this task to be inactive.
+ *
+ * XXX: implement read_unlock_no_resched().
+ */
+ preempt_disable();
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ preempt_enable_no_resched();
schedule();
} else {
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/