Re: [PATCH] Fix dirty page accounting inredirty_page_for_writepage()

[Ingo Molnar]

* Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am fine with how things developed. The core patches fell off the 
> priority list after job change. Just get the things that are not 
> right now straightened out.

Regarding the __xxx ops i'm on two minds really. If there's a 
significant architecture that really cannot live without them (if
it does not have the proper machine instructions _and_ local irq 
disabling is unreasonably expensive) then i guess we could (and 
should) add them.

Otherwise we should just try to be as simple as possible.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/