Re: [PATCH 0/3] removing unwanted module configs

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Apr 30 2009 - 10:44:43 EST



* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > Since this option can also be used for helping embedded
> > developers (I used it for that) I would not want to bloat the
> > kernel with running a script that is suppose to minimize it. But
> > if IKCONFIG && !IKCONFIG_PROC does not add more data to the
> > kernel, then I would be happy to turn it on by default.
>
> Actually, I can let the user decide. If it sees that IKCONFIG is
> not set, it can remove it from the .config output. When the
> silentoldconfig runs afterwards, it will ask the user if they want
> to enable it.

No, please offer reasonable non-interactive default behavior. It's
pretty well-defined, and it can be engineered to be self-sufficient
as well. Why not do that?

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/