Re: [PATCH] Fix dirty page accounting inredirty_page_for_writepage()

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Apr 30 2009 - 09:40:17 EST



* Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > to have a good look at the memory accounting code. We could
> > probably benefit of Christoph Lameter's cpu ops (using segment
> > registers to address per-cpu variables with atomic inc/dec) in
> > there. Or at least removing interrupt disabling by using preempt
> > disable and local_t variables for the per-cpu counters could
> > bring some benefit.
>
> Guess we are ready for atomic per cpu ops now that the new per cpu
> allocator is in? Segment register issues with the PDA are also
> solved right?

it's all done, implemented and upstream already. You are a bit late
to the party ;-)

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/