Re: [PATCH 00/19] tracing/workqueue: events support/enhancements,worklets tracing, fixes

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Thu Apr 30 2009 - 08:48:32 EST


On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:45:29AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patchset brings various features for the workqueue tracer.
> >
> > The support of events tracing (tracepoint expanding):
> > - workqueue_creation
> > - workqueue_flush
> > - workqueue_destruction
> >
> > Also for the worklets:
> > - worklet_enqueue
> > - worklet_enqueue_delayed
> > - worklet_execute
> > - worklet_complete
> > - worklet_cancel
> >
> > Now, most of the lifecycle of worklets and workqueues is available.
> >
> > The histogram tracing now also supports the worklets. You can
> > measure the max and average execution time of a worklet.
> >
> > A good bunch of Oleg's comments have been addressed, at least the
> > critical ones (races which can cause freed pointer dereferences, memory
> > leak, etc...). The rest is more about the design itself, such as using
> > the workqueue as the identifier instead of the thread and other things
> > that are in discussion.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Frederic.
> >
> > The following changes since commit a0e39ed378fb6ba916522764cd508fa7d42ad495:
> > Heiko Carstens (1):
> > tracing: fix build failure on s390
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing.git tracing/workqueue
> >
> > Frederic Weisbecker (6):
> > tracing/workqueue: turn cpu_workqueue_stats::inserted into unsigned int
> > tracing/workqueue: add execution time average column
> > tracing/workqueue: add open/release file handlers
> > tracing/workqueue: defer workqueue stat release if needed
> > tracing/workqueue: use the original cpu affinity on probe_workqueue_destruction
> > tracing/workqueue: provide documentation for the workqueue tracer
> >
> > KOSAKI Motohiro (2):
> > workqueue_tracepoint: introduce workqueue_handler_exit tracepoint and rename workqueue_execution to workqueue_handler_entry
> > tracing/workqueue: add max execution time mesurement for per worklet
> >
> > Zhaolei (11):
> > ftrace, workqueuetrace: make workqueue tracepoints use TRACE_EVENT macro
> > trace_workqueue: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each_entry_safe()
> > trace_workqueue: remove cpu_workqueue_stats->first_entry
> > trace_workqueue: remove blank line between each cpu
> > trace_workqueue: add worklet information
> > workqueue_tracepoint: add workqueue_flush and worklet_cancel tracepoint
> > workqueue_tracepoint: change tracepoint name to fit worklet and workqueue lifecycle
> > workqueue_trace: separate worklet_insertion into worklet_enqueue and worklet_enqueue_delayed
> > tracing/workqueue: turn workfunc_stats::inserted into unsigned int
> > tracing/workqueue: avoid accessing task_struct's member variable in stat file read
> > tracing/workqueue: use list_for_each_entry instead of list_for_each_entry_safe in probe_workqueue_destruction()
> >
> > Documentation/trace/workqueue.txt | 114 ++++++++++
> > include/trace/events/workqueue.h | 200 +++++++++++++++++
> > include/trace/workqueue.h | 25 --
> > kernel/trace/trace_stat.c | 8 +
> > kernel/trace/trace_stat.h | 3 +
> > kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c | 444 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > kernel/workqueue.c | 45 +++--
> > 7 files changed, 697 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/workqueue.txt
> > create mode 100644 include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> > delete mode 100644 include/trace/workqueue.h
>
> I think one worry here - and this mirrors some of Andrew's concerns
> - is the debug code to instrumented code ratio. There's 500 lines of
> instrumentation for 1000 lines of code.
>
> Is there a chance we can reduce that ratio, by factoring out bits of
> kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c and perhaps compressing
> include/trace/events/workqueue.h some more?



Hehe, indeed. By adding code here and there, I guess we
forgot to unify common bits. I will try to factorize that.



> Also, it would be nice to check how intuitive it is to visualize
> workqueue related details using the user-space ftrace-analyzer tool.
>
> Kernel developers are one thing - but most of the Linux developers
> are user-space developers so any workqueue tracing details have to
> be intuitive (and useful) to them. (even though workqueues are a
> fundamentally in-kernel abstraction)
>
> Ingo


Ok, I will see what it gives and give some examples.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/