Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: using move_irq_desc

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Apr 30 2009 - 03:30:32 EST



* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)

> +ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> obj-$(CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ) += numa_migrate.o
> +endif

hm, seeing such complicatons calls for the reintroduction
CONFIG_NUMA_IRQ_DESC - but plese make it a non-interactive
helper kconfig symbol, ok?

I.e. something like this:

config NUMA_IRQ_DESC
def_bool y
depends on SPARSE_IRQ && NUMA

this way we dont have yet another .config variant - and still have
nicer looking #ifdefs and makefile rules.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/