[PATCH mmotm] mm: alloc_large_system_hash check order

From: Hugh Dickins
Date: Wed Apr 29 2009 - 17:11:25 EST


On an x86_64 with 4GB ram, tcp_init()'s call to alloc_large_system_hash(),
to allocate tcp_hashinfo.ehash, is now triggering an mmotm WARN_ON_ONCE on
order >= MAX_ORDER - it's hoping for order 11. alloc_large_system_hash()
had better make its own check on the order.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Should probably follow
page-allocator-do-not-sanity-check-order-in-the-fast-path-fix.patch

Cc'ed DaveM and netdev, just in case they're surprised it was asking for
so much, or disappointed it's not getting as much as it was asking for.

mm/page_alloc.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- 2.6.30-rc3-mm1/mm/page_alloc.c 2009-04-29 21:01:08.000000000 +0100
+++ mmotm/mm/page_alloc.c 2009-04-29 21:12:04.000000000 +0100
@@ -4765,7 +4765,10 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(con
table = __vmalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC, PAGE_KERNEL);
else {
unsigned long order = get_order(size);
- table = (void*) __get_free_pages(GFP_ATOMIC, order);
+
+ if (order < MAX_ORDER)
+ table = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_ATOMIC,
+ order);
/*
* If bucketsize is not a power-of-two, we may free
* some pages at the end of hash table.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/