Re: [PATCH 18/29] x86/perfcounters: rename cpuc->active_mask

[Ingo Molnar]

* Robert Richter <robert.richter@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is to have a consistent naming scheme with cpuc->used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c |   10 +++++-----
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> index 3f3ae47..9ec51a6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> @@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ static u64 perf_counter_mask __read_mostly;
>  struct cpu_hw_counters {
>  	struct perf_counter	*counters[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX];
>  	unsigned long		used[BITS_TO_LONGS(X86_PMC_IDX_MAX)];
> +	unsigned long		active[BITS_TO_LONGS(X86_PMC_IDX_MAX)];
>  	unsigned long		interrupts;
>  	u64			throttle_ctrl;
> -	unsigned long		active_mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(X86_PMC_IDX_MAX)];
>  	int			enabled;

better would be to change ->used to ->used_mask. That makes it sure 
nobody does this typo:

	if (cpuc->used)

it's a lot harder to typo this:

	if (cpuc->used_mask)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/