Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: cpu_debug patches

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> @@ -850,10 +903,10 @@ static int cpu_init_cpu(void)
>  		cpui = &cpu_data(cpu);
>  		if (!cpu_has(cpui, X86_FEATURE_MSR))
>  			continue;
> -		per_cpu(cpu_model, cpu) = ((cpui->x86_vendor << 16) |
> -					   (cpui->x86 << 8) |
> -					   (cpui->x86_model));
> -		per_cpu(cpu_modelflag, cpu) = get_cpu_modelflag(cpu);
> +		per_cpu(cpu_modelflag, cpu) = get_cpu_flag(cpui);
> +		if (!per_cpu(cpu_modelflag, cpu))
> +			send_report(per_cpu(cpu_priv_count, cpu), cpui);

This means that if the CPU is not enumerated in the model table 
explicitly, we'll fall back to some really minimal output, right?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/