Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-CPU r**ursive lock {XV}

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

Hi.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:46:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds (torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > All those references support my argument that the lock is being
> > used recursively in this case.
> 
> What's so hard between understanding the difference between "used 
> recursively" and "recursive lock"?
> 
> THEY MEAN TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT THINGS!
> 
> The fact that you don't seem to understand that is one of the things I've 
> been complaining about all along.

Just ot be sure readers will not lose the discssion topic: do you object
against naming or realizaion? If its about the former, does 'dog's
breath lock' proposed by Stephen fit?

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/