[PATCH] ptrace-tracehook_unsafe_exec-remove-the-stale-comment-fix

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Mon Apr 27 2009 - 16:10:21 EST


(on top of ptrace-tracehook_unsafe_exec-remove-the-stale-comment.patch)

On 04/23, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > tracehook_unsafe_exec() doesn't need task_lock(), remove the old comment.
>
> Please make it instead say that cred_exec_mutex is held by the caller
> through the exec.

Thanks.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- PTRACE/include/linux/tracehook.h~COMMENT_FIX 2009-04-23 23:20:20.000000000 +0200
+++ PTRACE/include/linux/tracehook.h 2009-04-27 21:59:54.000000000 +0200
@@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ static inline void tracehook_report_sysc
* @task: current task doing exec
*
* Return %LSM_UNSAFE_* bits applied to an exec because of tracing.
+ *
+ * task->cred_exec_mutex is held by the caller through the do_execve().
*/
static inline int tracehook_unsafe_exec(struct task_struct *task)
{

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/