Re: [PATCH] Introduce a boolean "single_bit_set" function.

From: Robert P. J. Day
Date: Fri Apr 24 2009 - 09:52:30 EST


On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:57:11 -0700
> David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > +static inline __attribute__((const))
> > > +bool single_bit_set(unsigned long n)
> > > +{
> > > + return (n != 0 && ((n & (n - 1)) == 0));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +
> >
> >
> > It would be nice to be able to override this per architecture.
> >
> > For example a more efficient implementation on CPUs that have a
> > population count instruction (__builtin_popcountl()) might be:
> >
> > static inline __attribute__((const))
> > bool singe_bit_set(unsigned long n)
> > {
> > return __builtin_popcountl(n) == 1;
> > }
>
> Already done, via hweight_long().

i'm guessing that taking advantage of helper functions like that
might simplify code like, say, this from fs/nfs/internal.h:

/*
* Determine the actual block size (and log2 thereof)
*/
static inline
unsigned long nfs_block_bits(unsigned long bsize, unsigned char *nrbitsp)
{
/* make sure blocksize is a power of two */
if ((bsize & (bsize - 1)) || nrbitsp) {
unsigned char nrbits;

for (nrbits = 31; nrbits && !(bsize & (1 << nrbits)); nrbits--)
;
bsize = 1 << nrbits;
if (nrbitsp)
*nrbitsp = nrbits;
}

return bsize;
}


surely, there's a simpler way to write that.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.

Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/