Re: [PATCH] i2c: fix bit algorithm timeout for low values.

From: Jean Delvare
Date: Fri Apr 24 2009 - 05:43:21 EST


Hi Dave,

On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:09:13 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When fetching DDC using i2c algo bit, we were often seeing timeouts
> before getting valid EDID on a retry. The VESA spec states 2ms is the
> DDC timeout, so when this translates into 1 jiffie and we are close
> to the end of the time period, it could return with a timeout less than
> 2ms.
>
> Change this code to use time_after instead of time_after_eq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c b/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c
> index d420cc5..e25e139 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int sclhi(struct i2c_algo_bit_data *adap)
> * chips may hold it low ("clock stretching") while they
> * are processing data internally.
> */
> - if (time_after_eq(jiffies, start + adap->timeout))
> + if (time_after(jiffies, start + adap->timeout))
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> cond_resched();
> }

Applied, thanks. I agree this should go in stable.

--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/