[PATCH 1/6] tracing/wakeup: move access to wakeup_cpu into spinlock

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Fri Apr 24 2009 - 00:31:40 EST


From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>

The code had the following outside the lock:

if (next != wakeup_task)
return;

pc = preempt_count();

/* The task we are waiting for is waking up */
data = wakeup_trace->data[wakeup_cpu];

On initialization, wakeup_task is NULL and wakeup_cpu -1. This code
is not under a lock. If wakeup_task is set on another CPU as that
task is waking up, we can see the wakeup_task before wakeup_cpu is
set. If we read wakeup_cpu while it is still -1 then we will have
a bad data pointer.

This patch moves the reading of wakeup_cpu within the protection of
the spinlock used to protect the writing of wakeup_cpu and wakeup_task.

[ Impact: remove possible race causing invalid pointer dereference ]

Reported-by: Maneesh Soni <maneesh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
index b8b13c5..eacb272 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
@@ -138,9 +138,6 @@ probe_wakeup_sched_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,

pc = preempt_count();

- /* The task we are waiting for is waking up */
- data = wakeup_trace->data[wakeup_cpu];
-
/* disable local data, not wakeup_cpu data */
cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
disabled = atomic_inc_return(&wakeup_trace->data[cpu]->disabled);
@@ -154,6 +151,9 @@ probe_wakeup_sched_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
if (unlikely(!tracer_enabled || next != wakeup_task))
goto out_unlock;

+ /* The task we are waiting for is waking up */
+ data = wakeup_trace->data[wakeup_cpu];
+
trace_function(wakeup_trace, CALLER_ADDR0, CALLER_ADDR1, flags, pc);
tracing_sched_switch_trace(wakeup_trace, prev, next, flags, pc);

--
1.6.2.1

--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/