Re: [Scst-devel] Discussion about SCST sysfs layout and implementation.
From: James Smart
Date: Fri Apr 17 2009 - 10:27:44 EST
Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Let's go with root in /sys/class/scsi_tgt. In future, if somebody
objects, we can easily change it.
This maps too closely to the scsi midlayer names, especially the real
target devices initiators see - which are not yet in sysfs but there has
been discussion of in the past. I would prefer that you used
/sys/class/scst_tgt. And yes, as part of the class level support in the
midlayer/kernel, they are generally symlinks to the actual kobject in
the /sys/devices that the class entity corresponds to.
IMHO - "scsi_tgt" also seems a bit presumptuous to propose if SCST is
not, in it's entirety, going to be the adapter target interface pulled
in upstream. Thus, another reason I prefer the "scst_tgt" name, as it
makes it very specific to SCST itself, and lessens any co-existence
conflicts if there are any in the future.
-- james s
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/