Re: USB storage no-boot regression (bisected)

From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Wed Apr 15 2009 - 09:47:00 EST


Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:35:59PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Like Arjan said, this is because we are initializing faster now, and
things are a bit more asynchronous. Use the root_delay boot option,
that's what I use for my USB-based systems, and have not had a problem
with that at all.
Is that solution really scalable to every user with a regression severe enough it prevents them from booting?

When did regressions become an acceptable tradeoff for speed?

So, we aren't allowed to go faster?

Well, when the result fails to boot, you are only going faster to a point :)

Oh well...

Jeff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/