Re: RFC: introduce struct ksymbol

[Rusty Russell]

On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:28:39 pm Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Why not 'struct ksym'? That name is unused right now, it is shorter 
> and just as descriptive.
> 
> Regarding the change... dunno. Sam, Rusty - what do you think?

Yes, ksym is nice.  But agree with you that it's marginal obfuscation
to wrap it in a struct.

The current symbol printing APIs are awful; we should address them first
(like the %pF patch does) IMHO.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/