[PATCH 0/2] ext3 data=guarded

From: Chris Mason
Date: Tue Apr 14 2009 - 16:58:54 EST


Hello everyone,

Here is the ext3 data=guarded code again, this time it has passed some
basic tests. It should safely leave non data=guarded mounts alone and
only be dangerous when the new code is turned on (I hope).

On the performance side, it runs the same as data=writeback, except when
you're making files with holes where it runs the same as data=ordered.

There's definitely more CPU time involved with tracking the data=guarded
buffer heads and updating i_size when the IO is over, but at least on my
5 drive array that doesn't show up.

For the fsync + background streaming write workload, data=guarded does
fsync's in 0.8s, just like data=writeback. data=ordered on the same
test was doing between 5 and 30s per fsync, so it seems I've fixed that
part at least.

The next step is much more testing (blocksize != pagesize among others)
and much more review. But, I'm hoping for some feedback first on if
this is a direction we want to take the ext3 code.

The diffstat looks scary, but lots of the changes are comments...

-chris


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/