Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu_debug.c prepare report if files are lessor more then expected

From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Date: Tue Apr 14 2009 - 11:38:37 EST


On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 15:46 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > This will prepare the report to update cpu_debug
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_debug.h | 1 +
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_debug.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_debug.h
> > index 2228020..b64da5d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_debug.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_debug.h
> > @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ enum cpu_processor_bit {
> > #define CPU_ALL (CPU_INTEL_ALL | CPU_AMD_ALL)
> >
> > #define MAX_CPU_FILES 512
> > +#define MIN_CPU_FILES 10
> >
> > struct cpu_private {
> > unsigned cpu;
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c
> > index 46e29ab..1c3ebd4 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c
> > @@ -838,6 +838,14 @@ static int cpu_init_allreg(unsigned cpu, struct dentry *dentry)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > +/* Send Report to maintainer if files are less or more then expected */
> > +static void send_report(int files, struct cpuinfo_x86 *cpui)
> > +{
> > + pr_info("Please report \"cpu_debug files %d for %x:%x:%x:%x\" to"
> > + " jaswinderrajput@xxxxxxxxx\n", files, cpui->x86_vendor,
> > + cpui->x86, cpui->x86_model, cpui->x86_mask);
>
> i'd rather see this reported to linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, plus
> please use a WARN_ONCE() instead of a pr_info(). Hitting this is a
> bug we want to fix.
>

Subject: [PATCH] x86: cpu_debug.c prepare report if files are less or more then expected

This will prepare the report to update cpu_debug

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_debug.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_debug.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_debug.h
index 2228020..b64da5d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_debug.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_debug.h
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ enum cpu_processor_bit {
#define CPU_ALL (CPU_INTEL_ALL | CPU_AMD_ALL)

#define MAX_CPU_FILES 512
+#define MIN_CPU_FILES 10

struct cpu_private {
unsigned cpu;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c
index 46e29ab..71e7f57 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu_debug.c
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
#include <asm/apic.h>
#include <asm/desc.h>

+#define EMAIL "<linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <jaswinderrajput@xxxxxxxxx>"
+
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_cpuX_base, cpu_arr[CPU_REG_ALL_BIT]);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_private *, priv_arr[MAX_CPU_FILES]);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned, cpu_modelflag);
@@ -838,6 +840,14 @@ static int cpu_init_allreg(unsigned cpu, struct dentry *dentry)
return err;
}

+/* Prepare report for LKML and maintainer if files count are inappropriate */
+static void send_report(int files, struct cpuinfo_x86 *cpui)
+{
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "Please report \"cpu_debug files %d for %x:%x:%x:%x\" to"
+ " %s\n", files, cpui->x86_vendor, cpui->x86, cpui->x86_model,
+ cpui->x86_mask, EMAIL);
+}
+
static int cpu_init_cpu(void)
{
struct dentry *cpu_dentry = NULL;
@@ -861,9 +871,13 @@ static int cpu_init_cpu(void)

pr_info("cpu%d(%d) debug files %d\n",
cpu, nr_cpu_ids, per_cpu(cpu_priv_count, cpu));
+ if ((per_cpu(cpu_priv_count, cpu) < MIN_CPU_FILES))
+ send_report(per_cpu(cpu_priv_count, cpu), cpui);
+
if (per_cpu(cpu_priv_count, cpu) > MAX_CPU_FILES) {
pr_err("Register files count %d exceeds limit %d\n",
per_cpu(cpu_priv_count, cpu), MAX_CPU_FILES);
+ send_report(per_cpu(cpu_priv_count, cpu), cpui);
per_cpu(cpu_priv_count, cpu) = MAX_CPU_FILES;
err = -ENFILE;
}
--
1.6.0.6



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/