Re: [tip:x86/setup] x86, setup: "glove box" BIOS calls --infrastructure

[Ingo Molnar]

* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Sure, go ahead and wrap them in some kind of "save and restore all 
> registers" wrapping, but nothing fancier than that. It would just 
> be overkill, and likely to break more than it fixes.

Yeah. I only brought up the virtualization thing as a hypothetical: 
"if" corrupting the main OS ever became a widespread problem. Then i 
made the argument that this is unlikely to happen, because Windows 
will be affected by it just as much. (while register state 
corruptions might go unnoticed much more easily, just via the random 
call-environment clobbering of registers by Windows itself.)

The only case where i could see virtualization to be useful is the 
low memory RAM corruption pattern that some people have observed. 

The problem with it, it happens on s2ram transitions, and that is 
driven by SMM mainly - which is a hypervisor sitting on top of all 
the other would-be-hypervisors and thus not virtualizable.

Which leaves us without a single practical case. So it's not going 
to happen.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/