Re: High latency on /sys/class/thermal

[Tiago Simões Batista]

Sorry about the noise, by brain was stopped when I sent the last mail,
please ignore the From address, it is wrong!

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:14:16 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> (cc linux-acpi)
> 
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:56:12 +0100 "Tiago Sim__es Batista"
> <tiagosbatista@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all
> > 
> > Yesterday, I recompiled my kernel (git + tuxonice)
> > v2.6.30-rc1-1002-gac91f91, there were a couple of issues, the main
> > one is ilustrated bellow.
> > 
> > I am not familiar with the kernel code, but if you give me some
> > pointers, I will be glad to investigate this further
> > 
> > $time cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp 
> > 34000
> > 
> > real	0m6.613s
> > user	0m0.000s
> > sys	0m0.001s
> > 
> 
> Is this a regression?  Was 2.6.29 OK?
> 
> Thanks.

My last kernel was fine:

$ time cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp 
48000

real	0m0.007s
user	0m0.001s
sys	0m0.007s


I also forgot to add some information about my kernels...

The good one is 2.6.29 + tuxonice as it was the day after the 2.6.29
kernel was released.

The bad one is a pull from linus tree on april the 9th plus tuxonice on
the same day

from git (hope this helps):
$ git describe v2.6.29-tiago2-ice
v2.6.29-836-g00492ed
$ git describe v2.6.30-rc1-tiago1-ice
v2.6.30-rc1-1002-gac91f91


If tuxonice is a suspect, I will be glad to remove it and recompile.
If I have the time later this weekend, and nothing was found, I will
try to bisect this.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/