Re: [ath5k-devel] BUG in wiphy_update_regulatory when loadingath5k (on latest git)
From: Luis R. Rodriguez
Date: Fri Apr 10 2009 - 13:16:39 EST
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 09:18:23AM -0700, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> Alan Jenkins wrote:
> > Hi, while testing latest Git (i.e. 2.6.30-rc1 + a bit), I hit a bug
> > which killed my keyboard. SysRQ keys worked, but I couldn't type in X
> > or on the console.
>
> > This happened when ath5k was loaded dynamically, in response to my
> > pressing the "wireless toggle" key. (rfkill-input -> eeepc-laptop,
> > which does weird acpi-driven PCI hotplug).
> >
> > Can anyone at least explain where this weird backtrace comes from?
>
> Scratch that. I was able to reproduce it once and get a proper dmesg.
> My logs were just dropping all the useful bits. Here it is (taint is
> due to a libusual bug, note usual-tables(P) in list of modules, no
> binary crap here, honest).
>
> [ 64.995032] ath5k 0000:01:00.0: registered as 'phy0'
> [ 65.062652] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> 00000004
> [ 65.062665] IP: [<e0171332>] wiphy_update_regulatory+0x20f/0x295
> [cfg80211]
> [ 65.062705] *pdpt = 0000000008bf1001 *pde = 0000000000000000
> [ 65.062717] Oops: 0000 [#1]
> [ 65.062724] last sysfs file: /sys/class/backlight/eeepc/brightness
> [ 65.062734] Modules linked in: ath5k(+) mac80211 led_class cfg80211
> i915 drm i2c_algo_bit cfbcopyarea cfbimgblt cfbfillrect ipv6
> rfkill_input joydev usual_tables(P) snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel
> snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep uhci_hcd snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss i2c_i801
> ehci_hcd psmouse serio_raw i2c_core pcspkr atl2 snd_pcm intel_agp
> snd_timer usbcore agpgart eeepc_laptop snd_page_alloc ac video backlight
> output battery rfkill button processor evdev thermal fan ata_generic
> [ 65.062839]
> [ 65.062849] Pid: 2909, comm: modprobe Tainted: P
> (2.6.30-rc1eeepc #112) 701
> [ 65.062860] EIP: 0060:[<e0171332>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0
> [ 65.062885] EIP is at wiphy_update_regulatory+0x20f/0x295 [cfg80211]
> [ 65.062894] EAX: 00000000 EBX: c5da0000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: c5da0060
> [ 65.062904] ESI: 0000001a EDI: c5da0060 EBP: df3bdd70 ESP: df3bdd40
> [ 65.062913] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
> [ 65.062923] Process modprobe (pid: 2909, ti=df3bc000 task=c5d03000
> task.ti=df3bc000)
> [ 65.062930] Stack:
> [ 65.062935] df3bdd90 c5da0060 c04277e0 00000001 00000044 c04277e4
> c5da0060 00000002
> [ 65.062953] 00000002 c5da0000 0000001a c5da0060 df3bdda8 e01706a2
> 00000002 00000002
> [ 65.062971] 00000282 000080d0 00000068 c5d53500 00000080 00000282
> 00000080 c5da0140
> [ 65.062991] Call Trace:
> [ 65.062999] [<e01706a2>] ? wiphy_register+0x122/0x1b7 [cfg80211]
> [ 65.063028] [<e0328e02>] ? ieee80211_register_hw+0xd8/0x346 [mac80211]
> [ 65.063069] [<e06a7c9f>] ? ath5k_hw_set_bssid_mask+0x71/0x78 [ath5k]
> [ 65.063099] [<e06b0c52>] ? ath5k_pci_probe+0xa5c/0xd0a [ath5k]
> [ 65.063126] [<c01a6037>] ? sysfs_find_dirent+0x16/0x27
> [ 65.063146] [<c01fec95>] ? local_pci_probe+0xe/0x10
> [ 65.063162] [<c01ff526>] ? pci_device_probe+0x48/0x66
> [ 65.063176] [<c024c9fd>] ? driver_probe_device+0x7f/0xf2
> [ 65.063193] [<c024cab3>] ? __driver_attach+0x43/0x5f
> [ 65.063205] [<c024c0af>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x39/0x5a
> [ 65.063217] [<c024c8d0>] ? driver_attach+0x14/0x16
> [ 65.063228] [<c024ca70>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x5f
> [ 65.063240] [<c024c5b3>] ? bus_add_driver+0xd7/0x1e7
> [ 65.063252] [<c024ccb9>] ? driver_register+0x7b/0xd7
> [ 65.063272] [<c01ff827>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x32/0x85
> [ 65.063286] [<e00a8018>] ? init_ath5k_pci+0x18/0x30 [ath5k]
> [ 65.063309] [<c0101131>] ? _stext+0x49/0x10b
> [ 65.063322] [<e00a8000>] ? init_ath5k_pci+0x0/0x30 [ath5k]
> [ 65.063330] [<c012f452>] ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x4c
> [ 65.063330] [<c013a714>] ? sys_init_module+0x87/0x18b
> [ 65.063330] [<c0102804>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x22
> [ 65.063330] Code: b8 da 17 e0 83 c0 04 e8 92 f9 ff ff 84 c0 75 2a 8b
> 55 d4 8b 42 28 85 c0 74 0c 83 c0 04 e8 7c f9 ff ff 84 c0 75 14 a1 bc da
> 17 e0 <83> 78 04 03 74 66 8b 4d d4 80 79 08 00 74 5d a1 e0 d2 17 e0 48
> [ 65.063330] EIP: [<e0171332>] wiphy_update_regulatory+0x20f/0x295
What do you mean by you 2.6.30-rc1 + a bit. Are you using an unmodified
wireless-testing or are you applying patches on top?
Whip out gdb as follows:
gdb net/wireless/cfg80211.ko
Then do:
l *(wiphy_update_regulatory+0x20f)
That should show you the culprit line.
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/