Re: [PATCH][Checkstack] Don't censor output
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Apr 09 2009 - 19:43:23 EST
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:11:46 +0200
J__rn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH][Checkstack] Don't censor output
Please use the form
subsytem-identifier: what-i-did-to-it
so
[patch] checkstack: don't censor output
would suit here.
> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:11:46 +0200
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
>
> For reasons that neither Arnd nor I can remember, the s390 port of
> checkstack happened to ignore stack frames below 300 and above 10000
> bytes. Later on the same effect - arguably a bug - was copied into the
> arm, ia64, mips and sh64 ports.
>
> Fixing it also makes the regular expressions shorter and simpler.
>
> scripts/checkstack.pl | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --- debuggerhead/scripts/checkstack.pl~checkstack 2008-03-05 12:14:05.000000000 +0100
> +++ debuggerhead/scripts/checkstack.pl 2008-11-04 20:38:08.000000000 +0100
The patch fails to apply, yet nobody has changed checkstack.pl in ages.
I think you're tricking me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/