[PATCH] [2/16] POISON: Add page flag for poisoned pages

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue Apr 07 2009 - 11:20:21 EST



Poisoned pages need special handling in the VM and shouldn't be touched
again. This requires a new page flag. Define it here.

The page flags wars seem to be over, so it shouldn't be a problem
to get a new one. I hope.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
include/linux/page-flags.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/include/linux/page-flags.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/page-flags.h 2009-04-07 16:39:27.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/include/linux/page-flags.h 2009-04-07 16:39:39.000000000 +0200
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@
* PG_buddy is set to indicate that the page is free and in the buddy system
* (see mm/page_alloc.c).
*
+ * PG_poison indicates that a page got corrupted in hardware and contains
+ * data with incorrect ECC bits that triggered a machine check. Accessing is
+ * not safe since it may cause another machine check. Don't touch!
*/

/*
@@ -104,6 +107,9 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_IA64_UNCACHED_ALLOCATOR
PG_uncached, /* Page has been mapped as uncached */
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
+ PG_poison, /* poisoned page. Don't touch */
+#endif
__NR_PAGEFLAGS,

/* Filesystems */
@@ -273,6 +279,14 @@
PAGEFLAG_FALSE(Uncached)
#endif

+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
+PAGEFLAG(Poison, poison)
+#define __PG_POISON (1UL << PG_poison)
+#else
+PAGEFLAG_FALSE(Poison)
+#define __PG_POISON 0
+#endif
+
static inline int PageUptodate(struct page *page)
{
int ret = test_bit(PG_uptodate, &(page)->flags);
@@ -403,7 +417,7 @@
1 << PG_private | 1 << PG_private_2 | \
1 << PG_buddy | 1 << PG_writeback | 1 << PG_reserved | \
1 << PG_slab | 1 << PG_swapcache | 1 << PG_active | \
- __PG_UNEVICTABLE | __PG_MLOCKED)
+ __PG_POISON | __PG_UNEVICTABLE | __PG_MLOCKED)

/*
* Flags checked when a page is prepped for return by the page allocator.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/