Tomasz Chmielewski, on 04/04/2009 11:12 PM wrote:Vladislav Bolkhovitin schrieb:Hi All,
I set up http://scst.sourceforge.net/comparison.html page, which compares features of existing SCSI target subsystems for Linux. The comparison includes SCST, STGT, IET and LIO.
I might be not fully correct somewhere, so, if you don't agree with me about some item(s) in the comparison table, please let me know and I will fix that.
Performance is a bit debatable.
The result "in average" was listed in the comparison. Of course, one target can be better somewhere, another one somewhere else. That a nature of storage: it's pretty hard to optimize for all at once.
BTW, if I remember correctly your logs, you didn't apply all the SCST kernel patches on your kernel. Then your results aren't much applicable to this comparison, because it assumes all SCST kernel patches applied.