Re: Ext4 and the "30 second window of death"

[david]

On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 06:16:20PM -0700, david@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 05:55:11PM -0700, david@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > > Then they shouldn't use a mail client that fsync()s.
> > > >
> > > > so they need to use one mail client when they want to have good battery
> > > > life and a different one when they are plugged in to power?
> > >
> > > They need to make a decision about whether they care about their mailbox
> > > being precisely in sync with their server or not, and either use a
> > > client that adapts appropriately or choose a client that behaves
> > > appropriately. It's certainly not the kernel's business.
> >
> > the kernel is not deciding this, the kernel would be implementing the
> > user's choice
>
> No it wouldn't. The kernel would be implementing an adminstrator's
> choice about whether fsync() is important or not. That's something that
> would affect the mail client, but it's hardly a decision based on the
> mail client. Sucks to be that user if they do anything involving mysql.

in the case of laptops, in 99+% of the cases the user and the 
administrator are the same person. in the other cases that's something the 
user should take up with the administrator, because the administrator can 
do a lot of things to the system that will affect the safety of their data 
(including loading a kernel that turns fsync into a noop, but more likely 
involving enabling or disabling write caches on disks)

> > > If you can demonstrate a real world use case where the hard drive
> > > (typically well under a watt of power consumption on modern systems)
> > > spindown policy will be affected sufficiently pathologically by a mail
> > > client that you lose an hour of battery life, then I'd rethink this. But
> > > mostly I'd conclude that this was an example of an inappropriate
> > > spindown policy.
> >
> > remember that the mail client was an example.
> >
> > you want another example, think of anything that uses sqlite (like the
> > firefox history stuff, although that was weakened drasticly due to the
> > ext3 problems).
>
> Benchmarks please.

if spinning down a drive saves so little power that it wouldn't make a 
significant difference to battery lift to leave it on, why does anyone 
bother to spin the drive down?

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/