Re: 2.6.29 git, resume from ram broken on thinkpad

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday 02 April 2009, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> > Sorry for the misunderstanding, I thought the breakage might be introduced
> > between 15f7176eb1cccec0a332541285ee752b935c1c85 and
> > 0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f, so I thought it would be a good
> > idea to verify if 0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f fails too.
> 
> Ah, sure.  It fails too (both test_suspend=mem and regular suspend/resume).

Having looked at the commit the Arek's bisect turned up I don't think it's
likely to have caused this problem to appear.

It seems that the regression had been introduced before the PM and PCI updates
went it, so I bet it's one of the x86 changes.  Ingo, are there any commits
obviously worth testing?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/