Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib: add fast lzo decompressor

From: Andreas Robinson
Date: Thu Apr 02 2009 - 08:13:58 EST


On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 15:42 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I think if the cost is 40 ms once during boot on a slow platform, it's
> worth unifying the two codebases. I am *not* saying that I don't think
> boot performance matters -- far be from it -- but I think this is
> probably worth the reliability and maintainability advantages of having
> a single piece of code if at all possible.
>
> Of course, if you can figure out how to avoid that and still have the
> code clean, then that's another matter.

Alrighty. I will merge the two functions and if that turns out ugly, go
with the safe one, and submit a new patchset. I'll be right back. :)

Cheers,
Andreas

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/