Re: [PATCH] fix vmscan to take care of nodemask

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Mon Mar 23 2009 - 21:33:22 EST


On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:48:14 +0000
Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:03:56AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > try_to_free_pages() scans zonelist but doesn't take care of nodemask which is
> > passed to alloc_pages_nodemask(). This makes try_to_free_pages() less effective.
> >
>
> Hmm, do you mind if I try expanding that changelog a bit?
>
> ====
>
> try_to_free_pages() is used for the direct reclaim of up to
> SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages when watermarks are low. The caller to
> alloc_pages_nodemask() can specify a nodemask of nodes that are allowed
> to be used but this is not passed to try_to_free_pages(). This can lead
> to the unnecessary reclaim of pages that are unusable by the caller and
> in the worst case lead to allocation failure as progress was not been
> made where it is needed.
>
> This patch passes the nodemask used for alloc_pages_nodemask() to
> try_to_free_pages().
>
> ====
>
> ?

Thank you. I gradly use your text :)

>
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/buffer.c | 2 +-
> > include/linux/swap.h | 2 +-
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++-
> > mm/vmscan.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Mar21/mm/vmscan.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- mmotm-2.6.29-Mar21.orig/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ mmotm-2.6.29-Mar21/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ struct scan_control {
> > /* Which cgroup do we reclaim from */
> > struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
> >
> > + /* Nodemask */
> > + nodemask_t *nodemask;
> > +
>
> That comment is not a whole pile of help
>
> /*
> * nodemask of nodes allowed by the caller. Note that nodemask==NULL
> * means scal all nods
> */
>
> ?
>
ok.

> > /* Pluggable isolate pages callback */
> > unsigned long (*isolate_pages)(unsigned long nr, struct list_head *dst,
> > unsigned long *scanned, int order, int mode,
> > @@ -1544,7 +1547,9 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, s
> > struct zone *zone;
> >
> > sc->all_unreclaimable = 1;
> > - for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx) {
> > + /* Note: sc->nodemask==NULL means scan all node */
>
> Your choice, but I moved this comment to scan_control. I don't mind
> where it is really.
>
ok.


> > + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx,
> > + sc->nodemask) {
> > if (!populated_zone(zone))
> > continue;
> > /*
> > @@ -1689,7 +1694,7 @@ out:
> > }
> >
> > unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
> > - gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> > {
> > struct scan_control sc = {
> > .gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
> > @@ -1700,6 +1705,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct z
> > .order = order,
> > .mem_cgroup = NULL,
> > .isolate_pages = isolate_pages_global,
> > + .nodemask = nodemask,
> > };
> >
> > return do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
> > @@ -1720,6 +1726,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pag
> > .order = 0,
> > .mem_cgroup = mem_cont,
> > .isolate_pages = mem_cgroup_isolate_pages,
> > + .nodemask = NULL,
>
> While strictly speaking, this is unnecessary, I prefer it because it
> tells a reader that "yes, I really meant it to be NULL".
>
> > };
> > struct zonelist *zonelist;
> >
> > @@ -1769,6 +1776,7 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_da
> > .order = order,
> > .mem_cgroup = NULL,
> > .isolate_pages = isolate_pages_global,
> > + .nodemask = NULL,
> > };
> > /*
> > * temp_priority is used to remember the scanning priority at which
> > @@ -2112,6 +2120,7 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned
> > .may_unmap = 0,
> > .may_writepage = 1,
> > .isolate_pages = isolate_pages_global,
> > + .nodemask = NULL,
> > };
> >
> > current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
> > @@ -2298,6 +2307,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *z
> > .swappiness = vm_swappiness,
> > .order = order,
> > .isolate_pages = isolate_pages_global,
> > + .nodemask = NULL,
> > };
> > unsigned long slab_reclaimable;
> >
> > Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Mar21/include/linux/swap.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- mmotm-2.6.29-Mar21.orig/include/linux/swap.h
> > +++ mmotm-2.6.29-Mar21/include/linux/swap.h
> > @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static inline void lru_cache_add_active_
> >
> > /* linux/mm/vmscan.c */
> > extern unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
> > - gfp_t gfp_mask);
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *mask);
> > extern unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> > gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
> > unsigned int swappiness);
> > Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Mar21/mm/page_alloc.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- mmotm-2.6.29-Mar21.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ mmotm-2.6.29-Mar21/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -1598,7 +1598,8 @@ nofail_alloc:
> > reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
> > p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
> >
> > - did_some_progress = try_to_free_pages(zonelist, order, gfp_mask);
> > + did_some_progress = try_to_free_pages(zonelist, order,
> > + gfp_mask, nodemask);
> >
> > p->reclaim_state = NULL;
> > lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
> > Index: mmotm-2.6.29-Mar21/fs/buffer.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- mmotm-2.6.29-Mar21.orig/fs/buffer.c
> > +++ mmotm-2.6.29-Mar21/fs/buffer.c
> > @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static void free_more_memory(void)
> > &zone);
> > if (zone)
> > try_to_free_pages(node_zonelist(nid, GFP_NOFS), 0,
> > - GFP_NOFS);
> > + GFP_NOFS, NULL);
> > }
> > }
> >
>
> Otherwise looks good. With a better changelog and a comment other than "/*
> nodemask */" explaining what nodemask is;
>
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
>

Thank you for review !

Regards,
-Kame


> --
> Mel Gorman
> Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
> University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/