Re: [PATCH 3/3] utrace-based ftrace "process" engine, v2

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 03/23, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> Right now with ptrace(2) rewrite the following is easily triggerable:
>
> WARNING: at kernel/ptrace.c:515 ptrace_report_signal+0x2c1/0x2d0()

Yes, ptrace-over-utrace needs more work. But your message looks as if
utrace core is buggy, imho this is a bit unfair ;)

As Roland said, ptrace-over-utrace is not ready yet. If you mean that
utrace core should not be merged alone - this is another story.

But personally I understand why Roland sends utrace core before changing
ptrace.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/