Re: [PATCH 3 6/6] sched: Fix sd_parent_degenerate forSD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE.

From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
Date: Thu Mar 19 2009 - 12:56:34 EST


* Gautham R Shenoy <ego@xxxxxxxxxx> [2009-03-18 14:52:48]:

> Currently a sched_domain having a single group can be prevented from getting
> degenerated if it contains a SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE flag. But since it has
> only one group, it won't have any scope for performing powersavings balance as
> it does not have a sibling group to pull from.
>
> Apart from not provide any powersavings, it also fails to participate
> in normal load-balancing.
>
> Fix this by allowing such a sched_domain to degenerate and pass on the
> responsibility of performing the POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE to it's parent domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> kernel/sched.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 651550c..0e7882a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -6970,6 +6970,20 @@ sd_parent_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_domain *parent)
> SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES);
> if (nr_node_ids == 1)
> pflags &= ~SD_SERIALIZE;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the only flag that is preventing us from degenerating
> + * a domain with a single group is SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE
> + * check if it can be transferred to the new parent,
> + * and degenerate this domain. With a single
> + * group, it anyway can't contribute to power-aware load
> + * balancing.

can't contribute to any form of load balancing or
power savings.

(SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE flags has not being
listed in the flags needing more than 1 group)

> + */
> + if (pflags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE && parent->parent) {
> + pflags &= ~SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE;
> + parent->parent->flags |=
> + sd_power_saving_flags(parent->level);
> + }
> }
> if (~cflags & pflags)
> return 0;

--Vaidy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/