Re: [PATCH] floppy: Provide a PNP device table in the module.

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 17:50:47 +0000
Scott James Remnant <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The missing device table means that the floppy module is not
> auto-loaded, even when the appropriate PNP device (0700) is found.

Is this a regression?  Did 2.6.28 autoload OK?

> We don't actually use the table in the module, since the device doesn't
> have a struct pnp_driver, but it's sufficient to cause an alias in the
> module that udev/modprobe will use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Scott James Remnant <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/block/floppy.c |    8 ++++++++
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/floppy.c b/drivers/block/floppy.c
> index 83d8ed3..7aa1264 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/floppy.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/floppy.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ static int print_unex = 1;
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <linux/buffer_head.h>	/* for invalidate_buffers() */
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  
> @@ -4598,6 +4599,13 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Alain L. Knaff");
>  MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE("fd");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  
> +/* This doesn't actually get used other than for module information */
> +static const struct pnp_device_id floppy_pnpids[] = {
> +	{ "PNP0700", 0 },
> +	{ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pnp, floppy_pnpids);
> +
>  #else
>  
>  __setup("floppy=", floppy_setup);

Either way, this looks like 2.6.29 stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/