Re: [PATCH 03/18] dma-debug: add hash functions for dma_debug_entries

From: Joerg Roedel
Date: Fri Mar 06 2009 - 14:55:26 EST


On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:38:23PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Joerg Roedel - Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:25:35PM +0100]
> ...
> | > Nod :) The only problem could be (it depends) -- is that
> | > if one day some locking would be needed instead of fixing
> | > one function you would need to grep all list_add/del entries :)
> |
> | The access is already locked. And as the functions are only called
> | once each gcc should inline them automatically. At least gcc inlined
> | them in my kernels :)
> |
> | Joerg
>
> I didn't checked the precise code logic neither details, just wanted
> to point out that 'wrapping' functions are beneficial sometimes (especially
> when they hide details of internal data and provide some kind of interface
> to play with).

True. I agree with this. These functions improve the readability of the
code imho.

> Dunno Joerg, I think it would be better to point out that we want
> those functions being inlined by gcc 'inline' attribute explicitly.
> But you choose :)

Yeah, I think its better to let gcc choose what to inline and what not.
It has a good heuristic for that task :)

Joerg


--
| Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Operating | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach bei MÃnchen
System |
Research | GeschÃftsfÃhrer: Jochen Polster, Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis MÃnchen
| Registergericht MÃnchen, HRB Nr. 43632

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/