Re: [Patch] mm tracepoints

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 19:01 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 18:38 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 18:10 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > > Looks pretty good and useful to me. I've Cc:-ed more mm folks, 
> > > > > it would be nice to hear their opinion about these tracepoints.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Andrew, Nick, Peter, what do you think?
> > > > 
> > > > Bit sad we use the struct mm_struct * as mm identifier (little %lx vs %p
> > > > confusion there too), but I suppose there simply isn't anything better.
> > > 
> > > > Things missing, 
> > > 
> > > Why only anon and filemap, that misses out on all the funky 
> > > driver ->fault() handlers.
> > 
> > btw., does it include shm faults? I think all of this would 
> > be handled if the tracepoint was at handle_mm_fault(), 
> > right?
> 
> Partially, you wouldn't be able to do the file:offset thing 
> you asked for.

That could be done further down in filemap_fault(). I.e. have an 
all-encompassing tracepoint for all things [user-] page faults, 
and a few opt-in places for more interesting specific fault 
types.

> But yeah, also hugetlb seems to be missing.

Probably not that huge of an issue, given how rare those faults 
are ;-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/